IJACM Peer Review Process & Policy
Ensuring academic integrity and quality through a transparent, rigorous review process
Overview
International Journal of Advanced Computing and Mechanical Systems (IJACM) follows a rigorous single-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and integrity of all published work. To maintain the highest standards of academic integrity, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are concealed throughout the evaluation.
Review Stages & Quality Standards
Initial Submission & Screening
Manuscript assessed by Editor-in-Chief for scope alignment, formatting, and basic scientific soundness.
Expert Assignment
Manuscripts assigned to minimum two independent subject matter experts based on expertise.
Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers assess technical merit, methodology, and clarity, providing detailed feedback.
Editorial Decision
Editor-in-Chief reviews reports and decides: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
Final Verification
Revised manuscripts sent back to reviewers to ensure all concerns were addressed.
Reviewers provide feedback based on the following pillars:
Originality
Does the work provide a new contribution to the field?
Technical Rigor
Is the methodology sound and are results supported by data?
Clarity
Is the manuscript well-written, organized, and easy to follow?
Relevance
Does the research address current challenges or future trends?
Reviewer Ethics
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must recuse themselves if they have a relationship with authors that could bias judgment.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts are treated as confidential. Reviewers may not share or use data before publication.
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers should be "critical but kind," providing specific suggestions to help authors improve.